Supplementary Material for Borneman, et al. Science 2007
Snyder Group Home Page: www.yale.edu/snyder
Gerstein Group Home Page: bioinfo.mbb.yale.edu
Australian Wine Reserach Institute: www.awri.com.au
DOWNLOAD ALL
Paper Citatition
Comparison between Replicate Experiments
Binding Targets
Complete summary of regions bound in Saccharomyces sensu stricto species
Quantitative Differences in Binding Strength between Species
Miscellaneous
Supplementary Figures
Borneman et al. Divergence of Transcription Factor Binding Sites across Related Yeast Species. Science 317, 815-819 (2007)
Materials and Methods
Perspectives in ScienceKruglyak L and Stern DL. An Embarrassment of Switches. Science 317, 758-759 (2007).
Comparison between Replicate Experiments
Supplemental Table 1. Comparison of Ste12 binding sites between replicate experimentsSupplemental Table 2. Comparison of Tec1 binding sites between replicate experiments
Supplemental Table 3. Binding targets of Ste12 in S. mikataeSupplemental Table 4. Binding targets of Tec1 in S. mikataeSupplemental Table 5. Binding targets of Ste12 in S. bayanusSupplemental Table 6. Binding targets of Tec1 in S. bayanusSupplemental Table 12. Binding targets of Cph1 in C. albicans
Complete summary of regions bound in Saccharomyces sensu stricto species
Supplemental Table 7. Regions bound by Tec1 in the Saccharomyces sensu stricto speciesSupplemental Table 8. Regions bound by Ste12 in the Saccharomyces sensu stricto species
Quantitative Differences in Binding Strength between Species
Supplemental Table 9. Ste12 targets with quantitative differences in binding strength between speciesSupplemental Table 10. Tec1 targets with quantitative differences in binding strength between species
Supplemental Table 11. Genes bound by Tec1 and Ste12 and which change expression under pseudohyphal growthSupplemental Table 13. qPCR Confirmation of chIP chip and HDO arraysSupplemental Table 14. Sequence Independent array analysis
Supplemental Figure S1. Tiling array designSupplemental Figure S2. Measuring Threshold EffectsSupplemental Figure S3. Sequence alignmentSupplemental Figure S4. Difference in binding accounted for by Ty elements and genomic rearrangementsSupplemental Figure S5. Species specific motifs